Home 

 


 

 

 “The General Approaches on Women in Islam”
 

Conference on woman in Islam

LONDON-9th Sep 2001

 

 

By: Dr. Seyed G Safavi, LAIS, SOAS-University of London

philosophy@iranianstudies.org
 

 
 

There are two different kinds of approaches to the study on “Women in Islam”, which are as follows:

 

A.   The Theoretical Approach

B.                The Practical Approach

  

    The theoretical approach can be divided into four different categories that are as follows:

 

1.                 The Islamic Classical Reading

2.                 The Islamic Renewed Reading

3.                 The Feminist Reading

4.   The Oriental Reading.

 

A.   The Theoretical Approach

 

1-The Islamic Classical Reading

 

 

   In the Islamic Classical Reading on woman, woman has been considered as the second gender and her most important duty is giving different kinds of services to man. In this approach, woman is the passive member of both family and society, and man has the main and central role in both. Those following this reading, such as Azari, do not agree with the concept of equal rights for men and women.

 

     Those following the Classical Reading believe that woman is created for man, and her whole being, disposition, personality and perfection is solely dependent on her union with man. They believe in the “Gender Inequality” theory, and base their arguments on both the naturalness of the Shari’ah law and its compatibility with the Human Nature, and the “Natural Position” theory.  However in the New Classical Reading, attempts have been made to introduce the “Gender Balance” theory.

 

    Yet, there is no denying the fact that in the non-Islamic societies women are granted the fewer rights and opportunities than men.

 

    After the Islamic Revolution in Iran, senior government clerics were well aware that the Islamic Republic is dependent on women’s political allegiance and cannot afford either to ignore or to alienate them, and some of them consequently produced a new narrative on women and gender issues. Yet they too, like their Houzeh counterparts, came from a scholarly tradition that takes the inequality of the sexes for granted. Whereas the old narrative was silent on women’s social roles, the new one accepts women’s participation in society and politics, but retains the traditionalist assumptions about gender. (Islam and Gender, P. 49,1999).

 

2-“The Islamic Renewed Reading  

 

 

    However, so many of the Muslim scholars such as Imam Khomeini, Dr. Shari’ati, and Ayatollah Taleqani disagree with the Islamic Classical Reading on several important points and introduce the Renewed Reading. They regard men and women as “equals”. They consider both genders as inseparable parts of Mankind and God’s creations; and no matter whether they are man or woman; Mankind is the audience of Divine messengers. They believe that both genders should follow the Islamic rules and that both have the potential to become real believers and even Perfect Men and even according to Imam Khomeini, “Woman is the origin of true happiness” (Imam Khomeini, Tebyan, Vol. 8, P. 57, see also p.18, Tehran).

 

    Those following the “Islamic Renewed Reading” believe that both sexes are God’s servants and the best servant of God is the most virtuous one, no matter whether man or woman.

 

    In regard to social issues, most of them believe in the same and equal responsibilities and opportunities. In most of the social aspects, they say that both sexes should be given “equal” opportunities for Job, Education, social positions and etc. “woman is equal to man; she is free like man to choose her social activities and destiny”. (Imam Khomeini, Tebyan, vol.8, p.83, see also pp. 66, 69, 76, 83, 85,  195, 183-184, 270).

 

    In regard to family issues, most of them believe in the true Islamic family in which there is no “absolute power” and “authority” for either man or woman or child but there is authority for family as a union. This meaning that the family’s program and future should be arranged through discussion and consultation between all family members.

 

    The Islamic Renewed Reading goes beyond the Islamic Classical Reading in search of “new answers for new questions”. It no longer rejects an idea merely because it has a Western basis, nor does it see Islam as a fixed program of actions for the economic, social and political problems.

 

    This reading argues that the human understanding of Islam is flexible, that Islam’s tenants can be interpreted to encourage pluralism and democracy, that Islam allows change in the face of “time”, “place” and “experience”. Those following the Islamic Renewed Reading criticise both “Islamic Classical” and Western or Secular Readings on Women’s Rights.

 

 

3-The Feminist Reading

 

 

    “Feminism is grounded on the belief that women are oppressed or disadvantaged by comparison with men, and that their oppression is in some way illegitimate or unjustified. Under the umbrella of this general characterisation, there are however, many interpretations of women and their oppression”. (Concise Rutledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, P. 275 see also pp 278 & 280, London, 2000).

 

   The Muslim Modernists defines feminism as an “a social movement whose agenda is the establishment of women’s human rights. Feminism endeavours to free women from an unwanted subordination imposed on them by andocentric societies; it recognizes that women are independent and complete beings and puts the emphasis on the common humanity of the sexes, not their differences.” (Mir-Hosseini,Ziba. P. 249)

 

   The Feminist Reading can be divided into the two different kinds of Islamic Feminism and Western or Secular Feminism. Haleh Afshar, Leila Ahmed, Riffut Hassan, Waddud Muhsin, Azizah al-Hibri, Fatima Mirnissi, Nawal Saadawi, and Zanan Mugasin are all only a few of the feminist authors. “Their positioning is neither uniform nor simple. Some of them have clearly based their feminist approach on Islam, while others make a point of distancing themselves from any Islamic association.” (Ibid. P. 5)

 

    There are “two core issues around which feminism’s discomfort with religion is articulated. One is the claim that religion is largely a male enterprise, and has historically granted women a subordinate position. Two is the more recent phenomenon of the resurgence of politico-religious movements (in USA, Middle East and South Asia) whose goals are considered to be inimical to women’s interests.” (Ibid. P. 9) 

 

 

4-The Oriental Reading

 

 

 

 

B.   The Practical Approach

 

 

   In the Practical Approach, we can identify different social models among the Muslim countries, through the analysis and categorising of their practical behaviour as the objective or concrete society, as follows:

  

1. The Religious Muslim Countries Model: Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan (under the Taliban’s rule) are placed in this category with the common idea on following the Islamic values about women but with a wide range of differences on the understanding of Islam, Mankind and women rights. As we have already discussed, there are different readings of Islam on women rights in Iran. But even the most conservative Iranian Reading of woman rights is not comparable to the Taliban thoughts. Saudi Arabia and Taliban are close to each other and so far from the Iranian Muslim society model.

 

2. The Secular Muslim Countries Model: Turkey can be the very symbol of this model. There is a high clash in this country, between the government and people focusing on whether to follow the secular or Islamic values on the issue of woman rights, whereas most people emphasize on Islam and the government emphasizes on the secular values. And in another aspect, there are women with Islamic background who follow secularism. In this model, the Islamic behaviour and following the Islamic rules and values is indeed difficult for Muslim women, for the State rules oppose the Islamic values. So in turkey, women are not free to choose and follow their opinion.

 

3. The Secular/ Religious Countries Model: Pakistan, Malaysia and Bangladesh can represent this model. In this model, Islam is the formal religion of State. But the State’s law are not necessarily driven from Islam. The structure of the government is like Western countries. Women are free to follow either Islamic or secular values, but women, both Muslim and secular, are active on social issues and even some of them can achieve the top political levels of the State, such as the prime minister in Pakistan and Bangladesh. In Malaysia, Muslim women’s thoughts are so open that they can choose a clear and simple hijab, and are active in all kinds of different aspects of social issues. They ride bicycle, motorcycle and car and have a good education and knowledge.

 

 

Conclusion:

 

 

    There are two key elements on misunderstandings concerning the real position of women in Islam:

 

A.   Theoretical

B.    Practical

 

   In the Theoretical issues, we may say “False Theoretical Pre-assumptions” on Mankind, Society, History, Religion and Modernity are the main reasons for misunderstandings in the Classical, Feminist and Oriental Readings.

 

    In the Practical issues, some radical and orthodox conservative behaviour of Taliban and Saudi Arabia are the main reason of the misunderstandings about women in Islam. The Western media try to present Taliban and Saudi’s model as the representative of all Muslim countries, and ignore other models.

 

   However, to present an acceptable and coherent theory on “Women in Islam”, researches should notice the following elements:

 

1- Re-understanding of religious methodology on different aspects of Islamic sciences.

 

2- Renew a coherent approach to mankind, society, history, modernity and religion.

 

3- Equality does not mean parity and identity of rights and duties, but it means that gender is not used as a criterion in their determination. Gender is not the basis for perfection or defectiveness of women or men, but to connect them. God created both sexes perfect. Their difference is not for separating them but for connecting them.

 

4- Gender is a social and human concept and does not enter the divine realm, thus it could never have been a consideration for the divine Lawgiver Sexual markers recommended by religion cannot be taken as proof of gender roles.

 

5- Some of the fiqh theories obstruct the way to establishing equality between the sexes. A lot of jurists and hadith specialists have sacrificed the principle of equality in Islam to endorse a set of theories resting on assumption that is no longer valid but still remain part of fiqh.

6- Equality is the most important principle of the Islamic thought; and the entire rule concerning the woman rights should be based upon the Principle of Equality.
 

 
 

Bibliography

1- The Struggle of Muslim Women: K. Siddiqui, Kingsville, Maryland, U.S.A. 1985.

2- Status of Women in Islam: Jamal Badawi, A.T.P., Indianapolis Indiana,  U.S.A.

3- Women in Islam and Muslim Society: Hasan Turabi, Milestones Publications, London, 1991

4- Liberation of Women thru Islam: Dr. Kaukab Siddique, American Society for Education and Religion, Maryland, 1990. 

5- Islam and Gender: The Religious Debate in Contemporary Iran.    , Mir     Hosseini, Ziba Princeton, 1999.

6- Barlas, Asma "Believing Women" in Islam, University of Texas Press, 2002.

7- Leila Ahmed, Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate
Yale
University
Press, 1993.

8- Women in Islam and Muslim Society: Dr. Hassan Turabi.

9- Ismail Adam Patel, Islam: The Choice of Thinking Women, Ta-Ha Publishers Ltd. UK.

10-  Women and the Koran: The Status of Women in Islam. Contributors: Anwar Hekmat . Publisher: Prometheus Books. Place of Publication: Amherst, NY. Publication Year: 1997. Page Number: *.

11-  Feminists, Islam, and Nation: Gender and the Making of Modern Egypt. Contributors: Margot Badran . Publisher: Princeton University Press. Place of Publication: Princeton, NJ. Publication Year: 1995. Page Number: *.

12-  Women in Muslim Family Law. Contributors: John L. Esposito . Publisher: Syracuse University Press. Place of Publication: Syracuse, NY. Publication Year: 1982.

13- Women, Religion and Culture in Iran (Royal Asiatic Society Books)
~Sarah Ansari (Editor), Vanessa Martin (Editor)
RoutledgeCurzon
Hardcover - August 2001.

14- Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1992.

 

 

Home