“Hu”
“Past
and Present of Iran’s
Nuclear Talks with the West”
Professor Seyed G Safavi
Director of London
Academy of Iranian
studies
philosophy@iranianstudies.org
02 March 2006 at “Defense & Security Forum (DSF)”, London
Iran History, Economy & System Structure at a
glance :
Iran,
also called Persia, with
seven thousand years history of civilization, is a Middle Eastern country
located in Southwest Asia. She shares borders
with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan
to the north, Pakistan and Afghanistan to the east, and Turkey and Iraq to the west. In addition, she
borders the Persian Gulf across which lie Kuwait,
Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar,
and the United Arab Emirates.
The official name of the country is the Islamic Republic of Iran and Shi'a
Islam is the official state religion. Iran has area of 1,648,000 km2
and Population of 70,000,000.
Throughout history Iran has been of great geo-strategic importance
due to its position between the Middle East, Caucasia, Central Asia and the
Persian Gulf along with its proximity to Eastern Europe
and the Indian subcontinent.
Persia was one of two super power
of the ancient world. Iran
was attacked in last two centuries on four occasions, by foreign countries; Two
times by Russia, one time by
western countries during second word war and last time by Iraq
(1980-1988) with support of western countries. However, during this period, Iran has never
initiated attacked on other countries. In other words, Iran has a
defensive military strategy and not an aggressive one.
Iran has a long history of art,
music, architecture, poetry, philosophy, traditions, and spirituality. Many
Iranians believe their culture to be the one and only reason why their
civilization has continuously survived thousands of years of turmoil.
Iran is an Islamic Republic, whose
political system is laid out in the 1979 constitution. Iran is lead by The Supreme Leader and the
organizations managing the country are
the faculty of administration (government),
the Parliament (The Majles), the Judiciary, Supreme National Security
Council, the Assembly of Experts, the
Council of Guardians , the Expediency Council , and military organizations;
army and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC).
Iran's economy is a mixture of
central planning, state ownership of oil and other large enterprises,
agriculture, and small-scale private trading and service ventures. The current
administration has continued to follow the market reform plans of the previous
one and has indicated that it will pursue diversification of Iran's
oil-reliant economy. The Iranian government is attempting to expand its
investing revenues in other areas, including car manufacturing, aerospace
industries, consumer electronics, petrochemicals and nuclear technology. Iran is also hoping to attract billions of
dollars worth of foreign investment by creating a more favorable investment
climate, such as reduced restrictions and duties on imports and the creation of
free-trade zones like in Chabahar and the island of Kish.
Iran is OPEC's second largest oil
producer and holds 10% of the World's proven oil reserves. She also has the
World's second largest natural gas reserves (after Russia). The following is a brief
list of some of Iran’s
products:
Crude oil production: 3,625,000
bbls a day.
Minerals: Iron ore, coal, zinc,
lead, copper, bauxite, manganese, chromites, salt, bauxite, decorative stone,
Forestry: Approximately 11% of Iran is
forested, much of it in the Caspian region.
State investment has boosted
agriculture with the liberalization of production and the improvement of
packaging and marketing, helping to develop new export markets. Large-scale
irrigation schemes, together with the wider production of export-based
agricultural items such as dates, flowers and pistachios, produced the fastest
economic growth of any sector in Iran in the 90s. Agriculture
remains one of the largest employers. Iran has also developed a
biotechnology, nanotechnology and pharmaceuticals industry.
Iran's
major commercial partners are France,
Germany, Italy, Spain,
Russia, China, Japan
and South Korea.
Since the late 90s, Iran has
increased its economic cooperation with other developing countries, such as Syria, India,
Cuba, Venezuela and South Africa. Iran is also expanding her trade ties with Turkey and Pakistan,
and shares the common vision for the creation of a single economic market in
West and Central Asia, with her partners. Iran’s
GDP per head (PPP$) is 5,766.
Iran’s Nuclear Talks:
Over the past quarter century, Iran has served as a hot potato for the US.
After invading Afghanistan and
Iraq, the US set in motion various strategies to counter Iran, one of which was depicting Iran as a
nuclear threat jeopardizing the entire globe.
Doubts on Iran’s nuclear activities and objectives
prompted the West to exert political pressure on Iran starting in 2003. This measure
went in force on the basis of reports submitted to the US by the
anti-Iran terrorist group Mujahideen Khalq Organization (MKO).
From then on, the US mounted political and legal pressure on Iran. Given Iran’s lackluster media coverage of the events,
world public opinion was swayed by the US
militarist policies, so much so that the US now has the political
initiative.
The US
harbors the following objectives behind depicting Iran as a nuclear threat:
- engulfing Iran in a sensitive
international dispute
- turning Iran
passive toward vital regional issues, such as those involving Afghanistan, Iraq,
Palestine, and Lebanon
- making Iran submissive toward Western
demands
- assessing Iran’s reactions toward
political and legal pressure exerted by the West to come up with a future
action plan
- forming a global consensus against Iran, in case it does not yield (to US
pressure)
- creating tension in Europe-Iran relations
- uniting with Europe to slap economic bans on Iran
- preparing the ground for limited and localized
military action against Iran
Once these objectives were made
public in 2003, Iran
declared that its nuclear activities were for entirely peaceful purposes and
that it had no plans to produce nuclear weapons. To counter the US strategy, Iran devised the following
measures:
- avoiding military confrontation
- opting for diplomacy
- making its nuclear activities transparent
- building trust in the international community
- embarking on détente
Four Advantages:
In tune with
the aforementioned strategy, Iran
granted four basic concessions to the West without getting any concessions in
return:
- volunteering
to be a signatory of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) annex protocol,
while legally not compelled to do so
- allowing
rigorous and unannounced inspection of all Iranian sites
- volunteering
to give Iran’s
classified nuclear information to the West
- postponing
uranium enrichment, while as an NPT member, Iran has the inalienable right
to possess the uranium enrichment technology.
Article 4 of the Non
Proliferation Treaty (NPT) allows all countries to utilize any needed
technology to make non-military use of atomic energy, such as generating
electricity, and to enrich uranium and produce plutonium.
During two years of inspections,
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors have found no evidence
of Iran
producing nuclear weapons. This has time and again been corroborated by the
IAEA director El-Baradei; nonetheless, Iran’s
nuclear case is still open, and, while getting huge concessions from Iran, the West
has not given any palpable concessions in return. Then after reformist
government, Iran
new conservative government looks at new approach to diplomatic nuclear talks.
Iran’s present Nuclear Talks with the West
Iran’s
Supreme National Security Council (INSC) decides and governs Iran’s nuclear
negotiations. Secretary of INSC is Dr Ali Larijani, who is very close to
Supreme Leader of Iran. Members of the INSC are President, Head of Judiciary,
Parliament’s Spokesman, Chief Commander of IRGC, ministers of defense,
intelligence, foreign affairs, interior, two representative of Supreme Leader,
and chief staff of military forces.
At present, there are 3 opinions on nuclear
policies in Iran:
1. The Reformists contend that Iran’s foreign
policy should move from a security-ideological dialog to a cultural-economic
one. They hold that the military mindset should not permeate Iran’s foreign
policy dialogs. In actuality, Iran
has not made dramatic advances in the area of peaceful nuclear technology. The
current hullabaloo over Iran’s
nuclear might has been set in motion by the domestic, American, and Israeli
conservatives for their own vested interests. To safeguard its long term
interests, Iran should come
to terms with the West in regard to the nuclear issue and show the needed
flexibility, since Iran
is not – and should not be – a nuclear power.
They are ,currently, isolated
from the power .
2. The Pragmatists who are the technocrats and
executives hold that détente is on the right track but should be promoted to a
fructifying diplomacy. They opt for suspending or halting uranium enrichment,
if it allows Iran to get considerable concessions from the US and Europe,
insures Iran’s national security in beneficial political negotiations, and
turns Iran into the crossroads of peace and security in the Middle East and
Central Asia.
3. The New-Conservatives (Usol gerian) base
the foreign policy on the values cherished by the Islamic Revolution of Iran,
crystallized in “rejecting bullies and bullying”. They currently control Iran’s power.
They believe that US, Israel, and Europe are essentially making
bullying demands that run contrary to international laws and to Iran’s
legal rights as an NPT signatory. Citing what they call “Iran’s non-transparent
objectives”, the West has established a bullying system that runs counter to
international laws and legal commitments. The West overtly says that some
countries, including Iran,
should be deprived of access to certain technologies. This is tantamount to
trampling on the national sovereignty of these countries, the group notes and
believes that Iran
should vehemently stand against all such pressures.
The group, moreover, opposes any
political negotiation with the West over uranium enrichment, yet it favors
constructive dialogs in a bid to build trust, provided that these dialogs have
specific time frames. If the West finds no evidence of Iran’s non peaceful nuclear objectives before
the deadline, Iran
should be allowed to pursue uranium enrichment for peaceful purposes in tandem
with its nuclear rights.
In case Europe tries to buy time
in the negotiations, Iran
should resume uranium enrichment, while in case of increased Western pressure; Iran should
withdraw from the annex protocol.
In the event that Iran’s nuclear case will refer to the UN
Security Council, and they start sanction against Iran,
Tehran should
withdraw from the NPT and simultaneously build up its defense and economic
powers.
New Strategy of Iran’s Nuclear talks
Iran’s present diplomatic nuclear
talks based on the following principles:
1-
Subject of nuclear talks is transparency
of Iran activity, but not
giving up of Iran’s
rights.
2-
Both sides ought to attempt to
build trust, rather than this being a one-sided effort by the Iranians.
3-
Iran
is ready to talk with international community, including USA, as
catalysis.
4-
Enrichment of uranium for civil nuclear
technology is an absolute right in Iran’s view.
5-
Iran
emphasises again that nuclear technology of Iran is just for civil and peaceful
purposes.
6- Diplomatic
solution is the best way for both sides. Sanctions or military attack are not
effective on Iran.
If the US or Tel Aviv regime attacks to Iran,
Iran will immediately
retaliate, by attacking them in Iraq,
Israel and Afghanistan.
7- It is
unwise to under-estimate Iran
and classes her with the likes of Iraq
and Libya.
Iran
has 1 million soldiers, 11 million militants (basiji) and a population
of 70 million, with an area of 1.648,000 km2; she is also one of the
world main producers of oil and gas.
Iran’s new offers:
1-
Establishment of an international
consortium in Iran
for nuclear technology. Iran
international shareholders may monitor Iran
nuclear activity, thereby, assuring themselves that Iran’s nuclear activities are only
for civil purposes.
2-
US has to cancel sanction against
Iran.
In return, Iran
shall postpone industrial enrichment of uranium for one year as a part of
building trust from both sides. However, scientific research will continue
during this period. Iran
will give a reply to IAEA pre-determined questions.
Conclusion
The new homogonous system in Iran and nuclear file will be best opportunity
for the West and Iran
to restart new relationship based on common interests and security.
Interaction, stability, or
confrontation between the West and Iran will, undoubtedly, enter a new
phase in the near future.

